Diogo Jota Crash: 36,000 Deleted Messages and a Mysterious “Don’t Answer” Contact Deepen the Enigma
The investigation into the tragic car crash that killed Liverpool footballer Diogo Jota and his brother André Silva on July 3, 2025, near Zamora, Spain, has taken a dramatic turn with the recovery of Jota’s phone logs. Forensic technicians retrieved 36,000 deleted messages, including 12 from a contact labeled “Don’t Answer,” sent in the four hours leading up to the crash at 12:30 AM. The owner of this mystery number remains unidentified, intensifying speculation about Jota’s final hours. Combined with prior clues—a tailing car, a smartwatch distraction, unanswered calls, a deleted text to “M,” a cryptic voicemail, a warning letter, and mechanical anomalies—this revelation suggests Jota was entangled in urgent, possibly troubling communications before the fatal accident that claimed the lives of the 28-year-old Premier League star and his 25-year-old brother.
The Crash and the Phone Logs Revelation
Diogo Jota and André Silva, a professional footballer for Penafiel FC, died when their Lamborghini Huracán veered off the A-52 highway near Cernadilla, Zamora, after a suspected tire blowout during an overtaking maneuver. The vehicle crashed into the central reservation and burst into flames. Initially, Jota was believed to be heading to Santander for a ferry to England, advised against flying due to recent lung surgery. However, GPS data revealed a divergent route, and a web of clues has emerged: a voicemail to a blocked number ending “Tell her… I tried,” a text to “M” deleted at 11:57 PM, a location pin sent at the same time, a glovebox letter with red lipstick warning “You’ll Regret This Drive,” two unanswered calls at 12:19 AM, no braking until after impact, rapid deceleration from 180 to 74 km/h in 3.9 seconds missing a turn by 2.4 meters, a car tailing for 18.6 km that vanished 0.7 km before the crash, and a smartwatch notification 17 seconds before impact displaying a name that shocked Jota’s wife, Rute Cardoso.
The latest breakthrough comes from forensic analysis of Jota’s phone, partially damaged in the fire but recovered enough to extract data. Technicians retrieved 36,000 deleted messages, spanning an unspecified period but including 12 messages from a contact labeled “Don’t Answer” received between 8:30 PM and 12:30 AM on July 3. The content of these messages remains undisclosed, but their volume and the provocative contact name suggest Jota was avoiding communication with someone significant. Spanish investigators are working to trace the number’s owner, cross-referencing it with the blocked number from the voicemail, the “M” contact, and the recipient of the location pin. The timing of the messages, particularly in the hours before the crash, aligns with Jota’s urgent activity, including the unanswered calls and the smartwatch glance that delayed his braking.
The “Don’t Answer” Mystery
The contact labeled “Don’t Answer” has become a focal point of the investigation. The 12 messages, sent in the four hours before the crash, indicate persistent attempts to reach Jota, who apparently chose not to respond. This could explain the two unanswered calls at 12:19 AM, 11 minutes before the crash, and the smartwatch notification at 12:29:43 AM, which displayed a name that shocked Rute Cardoso. Investigators are exploring whether “Don’t Answer” is linked to “M,” the voicemail’s “her,” or the tailing car’s driver. The label suggests Jota was wary of this contact, possibly due to a personal conflict, threat, or unwanted communication, as hinted by the letter’s warning, “You’ll Regret This Drive.”
The sheer volume of 36,000 deleted messages raises questions about Jota’s digital activity. While not all may be relevant, their deletion suggests an intent to conceal communications, either by Jota or someone with access to his phone. The Guardia Civil is using advanced forensic tools to recover the content of the “Don’t Answer” messages and determine their context—whether they were personal, professional, or threatening. The number’s owner remains a mystery, with challenges in tracing it due to potential use of a burner phone, VoIP line, or spoofing technology, which scammers often employ to mask identities.
Connecting the Clues
The “Don’t Answer” messages weave into the investigation’s complex tapestry. The tailing car, captured on CCTV for 18.6 km before vanishing 0.7 km from the crash, suggests someone may have been monitoring Jota. The smartwatch notification, 17 seconds before the crash, likely tied to a call or message, distracted Jota, delaying his braking and causing him to miss the turn by 2.4 meters. The tire blowout, potentially triggered by an oil patch, loosened gravel, or a metallic shard not belonging to the Lamborghini, combined with no braking until after impact, indicates a chaotic sequence. The voicemail’s “Tell her… I tried,” the deleted text to “M,” and the red-lipstick-marked letter suggest a personal or emotional conflict, possibly involving a female figure.
Investigators are probing whether “Don’t Answer” connects to these elements. Was the contact a woman, perhaps linked to the lipstick or the voicemail’s “her”? The location pin at 11:57 PM and the deleted text to “M” at the same time suggest Jota was sharing his whereabouts, possibly with “Don’t Answer.” The unanswered calls at 12:19 AM could be further attempts by this contact to reach him, culminating in the smartwatch notification. The 37-second stop 14 km earlier and the right-turn input 4.2 seconds before the crash add to the timeline’s complexity, potentially indicating Jota’s response to being followed or a mechanical issue.
Investigation Challenges
The investigation faces significant obstacles. The fire damaged the Lamborghini’s ECU, though it confirmed the deceleration data. The phone’s partial damage complicates full recovery of the 36,000 messages, though the “Don’t Answer” messages are a priority. The smartwatch’s data is limited by heat exposure, and the CCTV gap during the crash obscures the tailing car’s fate. The letter’s reconstruction and the red lipstick trace are ongoing, with no confirmed matches. Two Portuguese lorry drivers, José Aleixo Duarte and Azevedo, disputed police claims of speeding, citing the A-52’s poor condition, which supports the role of road hazards. A similar crash at the same spot, noted by witnesses, strengthens this theory. Tracing the “Don’t Answer” number is hindered by potential spoofing or unlisted status, requiring international cooperation if the number is registered outside Spain.
The Football Community’s Response
The football world continues to mourn, with Liverpool retiring Jota’s number 20 shirt and fans leaving tributes at Anfield, including a placard reading “Diogo lives forever.” Teammates like Virgil van Dijk, who carried a floral number 20 at the funeral, and Cristiano Ronaldo, who called the loss “senseless,” have shared profound grief. Rute Cardoso, supported by Liverpool’s pledge to pay out Jota’s £34.4 million estate, is reeling from the smartwatch revelation and now the “Don’t Answer” mystery. The brothers’ funeral in Gondomar, attended by players like Rúben Neves, highlighted their deep ties to their hometown.
A Growing Mystery
The recovery of 36,000 deleted messages, including 12 from “Don’t Answer,” paints a picture of Jota grappling with urgent, possibly troubling communications before his death. Who owned this mystery number, and why was Jota avoiding them? As the Guardia Civil works to trace the contact, recover message content, and connect it to “M,” the voicemail, the letter, and the tailing car, the tragedy of Diogo Jota and André Silva grows more perplexing. The football world, united in grief for a “friend to everyone,” as described by Liverpool manager Arne Slot, awaits answers to a case that continues to unravel with each haunting revelation.
