The character’s story was left open-ended in the final moments of Bridgerton season 3, and that was intentional. But is the continuation of Cressida’s story really necessary?

Cressida Cowper’s role in Bridgerton season 3 honestly ended up surprising me. At first, I thought she was just going to be Eloise’s new friend now that the outspoken Bridgerton and Penelope had a falling out after Eloise found out her best friend is actually Lady Whistledown. But Cressida’s role became so much more in the third season, and it really did make for some of the best high-stakes situations in the story. Though now that the season is over and the way this plotline ended, do we really need more Cressida Cowper in Bridgerton season 4?
The Netflix hit has already been renewed, though we don’t know who the next leads are just yet. In the third season we saw Cressida become friends with Eloise, under pressure from her parents to find a suitor of her choice or she’d marry one of her dad’s friends, almost getting stuck with tying the knot with Lord Greer, pretending she’s Lady Whistledown, failing at that, and then finally getting sent away to live with her strict aunt in Wales. So, yeah. A lot happened with this character.

It’s a bit of a tragic ending for Cressida, even though she was a big bully in the first two seasons. While I don’t feel particulary bad for her, I can kind of understand the desperation and where she’s coming from. She’s a young woman who’s told by everyone around her that she isn’t smart, and the only opportunity she has in life is to marry. She was looking for some independence and freedom, and I can’t really fault her for that.
Unfortunately, she just went about everything the wrong way. Including blackmailing Penelope. After all of this and because we do still remember she was a bully, I don’t really think we need more of Cressida in the fourth season. But apparently showrunner Jess Brownwell and executive producer Shonda Rhimes don’t not feel the same. Here’s what Brownwell told Entertainment Weekly:
“We shot an alternate ending where her mother gets in the carriage at the end and actually chooses her daughter. It was a really beautiful moment. But in the edit, [Shonda [Rhimes] and I talked about the fact that it felt like an ending for Cressida. It felt like it wrapped up her story and we intentionally wanted to leave it so that we can tell a bit more story with Cressida next season.”

In fact, Cressida’s scene in the carriage may not be what we think it is. While it seems to hint that she does indeed go off with her aunt, Cressida actress Jessica Madsen told EW that she herself doesn’t know “whether she is going to her aunt’s because we actually don’t see her aunt in the carriage. So, it could be that she’s off somehwere by herself.” What does that mean? Where could she go? She has been shunned by the ton for her actions and her parents are clearly as unsupportive as ever.
With the Bridgerton season 3 finale, aka episode 8, being an episode that portrayed so many reconciliations, including two with mothers and daughters (Penelope and Portia, Francesca and Violet), it would have been so nice to actually see Lady Cowper choose her daughter and get in the carriage with her. It would have fit into one of the themes of the episode. Honestly with it being kept open-ended now and the creative team’s plans for more Cressida next season. I really don’t think it’s necessary.
I wish they’d just leave it the way they did, or had just given us an ending for the character, no matter what direction they chose. But really Lady Cowper choosing her daughter would have been best and this is a missed opportunity. I think the inclusion of Cressida in season 3 with the blackmail and the Lady Whistledown claims were genius, but now the character has served her purpose and there’s no reason to bring Cressida back in Bridgerton season 4. What do you think?
News
THE LAST PERSON WHO SAW HER Witnesses in Amy Hillyard’s neighborhood say they may have spotted her walking alone late at night. Investigators are now trying to confirm whether that sighting happened minutes before her car was discovered nearby
More than three weeks after Amy Hillyard vanished on March 25, 2026, the search for the 52-year-old co-owner of Farley’s Coffee continues across Oakland’s neighborhoods, parks, and hiking trails. No evidence of foul play has been reported, but Amy remains…
THE LAST TEXT MESSAGE Friends searching for answers say Amy Hillyard exchanged messages with someone shortly before she vanished on March 25. What investigators are now trying to determine is whether that final conversation reveals where she intended to go that night
Amy Hillyard, the 52-year-old co-owner of the beloved Farley’s Coffee shops in Oakland and San Francisco, has been missing since March 25, 2026. More than three weeks later, her family, friends, and investigators continue an intensive search across Oakland’s trails,…
THE ARGUMENT BEFORE SHE VANISHED? Friends say café owner Amy Hillyard had been under intense emotional strain in the weeks before she disappeared in Oakland. Investigators are now quietly examining whether tension inside the home — including a reported disagreement with her husband — may have played a role in the hours before she vanished on March 25. But one unanswered question remains: what happened after she left the house that night?
Amy Hillyard, a 52-year-old co-owner of the popular Farley’s Coffee shops in Oakland and San Francisco, vanished on March 25, 2026, leaving behind a close-knit family, a thriving business community, and a Bay Area neighborhood stunned by her absence. Described…
THE PRIMROSE HILL TRAGEDY. 21-year-old filmmaker Finbar Sullivan lost his life during a violent altercation on the famous London viewpoint as authorities named 27-year-old Oliuwadamilola Ogunyankinnu in court documents — a small group frozen on the hilltop watching in silence
On the evening of April 7, 2026, the panoramic viewpoint atop Primrose Hill — a beloved north London landmark offering sweeping views of the city skyline — transformed from a place of beauty and relaxation into a scene of sudden…
18-second video at Primrose Hill is now at the center of the investigation after 21-year-old filmmaker Finbar Sullivan collapsed following a heated confrontation; police charged Oliuwadamilola Ogunyankinnu but the missing footage filmed by a girl in a pink vest is still circulating online
On the evening of April 7, 2026, Primrose Hill — one of north London’s most picturesque spots with its sweeping views of the city skyline — became the site of a sudden and deadly confrontation. 21-year-old Finbar Sullivan, a filmmaking…
A 20-second clip allegedly capturing Finbar Sullivan’s final argument atop Primrose Hill is becoming crucial evidence as Oliuwadamilola Ogunyankinnu faces charges—but the three-word assertion is still causing a stir on social media
In the fading light of a spring evening on April 7, 2026, a brief, heated exchange at Primrose Hill’s scenic viewpoint escalated into fatal violence. 21-year-old filmmaking student Finbar Sullivan was testing a new birthday camera when, according to witnesses…
End of content
No more pages to load