The central dilemma (and the very attractive couple seeking to resolve it) of the first season has been excised, giving this opening episode – ‘Capital-R-Rake’ – the feeling of a spin-off
To call Bridgerton “Jane Austen with sex” would do a disservice to both parties. But when it first aired in 2020, Netflix’s adaptation of Julia Quinn’s novels inevitably drew that trite observation. It is, after all, a show that embraces the conventions of social class, stately homes and slow-burn wooing that Austen has popularised for two centuries. If Austen is buttoned-up, unrequited and implicit, then Bridgerton rendered the same dynamics in overt, even garish colours – not to mention a smattering of breasts and buttocks. And where Austen is favoured by folk who are horny for etiquette, Bridgerton catered to an even larger demographic: people who are just plain horny.
As it returns, the show hopes to pick up where it left off, tonally if not narratively. Bridgerton is, fundamentally, about courtship, not marriage. Hence Daphne (Phoebe Dynevor) and Simon (Regé-Jean Page), the Duchess and Duke of Hastings, are shuffled out of the pack, and replaced by a bevy of childless singletons. Foremost amongst the new arrivals are the Sharma sisters, Kate and Edwina (Sex Education’s Simone Ashley and Alex Rider’s Charithra Chandran respectively). The Sharmas represent an inversion of Sense and Sensibility’s core dichotomy: Edwina, the Marianne figure, wants to marry “a prince or duke’’, while her older sister Kate – the Eleanor – urges her to marry for love. Yet Kate is the responsible “old maid”, terrifyingly considered, at 26, of too advanced years to find a husband of her own.
Of the extant cast, the plot reins are passed predominantly to Jonathan Bailey’s chaotic Anthony Bridgerton and his truculent younger sister Eloise, played by Line of Duty’s Claudia Jessie. Anthony, having been ditched by his opera singer squeeze, is on the hunt for a wife. He pursues Edwina, who has won Queen Charlotte’s title of “diamond of the season”, whilst flirting incessantly with her sister, and guardian, Kate. Eloise, meanwhile, has “come out” but is desperately avoiding all possible suitors. Just as importantly, Penelope Featherington (Derry Girls’ Nicola Coughlan) has now been unmasked (to viewers at least) as Lady Whistledown, which removes one of the central mysteries of Bridgerton, even if it allows us to witness the methodology of someone labelled an “insipid wallflower” by her peers.
The reset of this new series of Bridgerton is, it must be said, a touch harsh. The entire central dilemma (and the very attractive couple seeking to resolve it) of the first season has been excised, giving this opening episode – “Capital-R-Rake” – the feeling of a spin-off. They might as well have renamed the entire show The Other Bridgertons. And on a spectrum running from Frasier to Joey, The Other Bridgertons would be somewhere in the middle: a more trivial work than its parent, but not without its charms.
The reality is that Daphne, for all her doe-eyes and baby hairs, was a less charismatic Bridgerton than either Anthony or Eloise. Indeed, in her proto-feminist, anti-establishment leanings, Eloise always had a stronger sense of Main Character Energy than her elder sister (she has begun reading Mary Wollstonecraft, labelled “rather haughty” by Penelope, in the off-season absence of Lady Whistledown’s gossip rag). All the same, the new season lacks the romantic vigour of Simon’s tortured pursuit of Daphne – the dynamic between Kate and Anthony (all rather transparently Lizzie Bennett and Mr Darcy) feels much more forced. And Jonathan Bailey, even with a razor applied to his period facial hair, felt more convincing and comfortable as the wayward son than the romantic lead.
But look, sometimes television criticism, like television itself, is best served by erring towards the facile. And Bridgerton harbours no illusions about what it is: a profoundly unsubtle opportunity to see beautiful, bonneted people tup by candlelight. From the overdressed sets – which have the same aesthetic as a WeWork on Valentine’s Day – to the overdressed cast, it is a show that indulges our basest qualities, but does so delightfully. Bridgerton might be close to losing the plot, but be honest with yourself: you weren’t watching for that anyway.
News
THE LAST PERSON WHO SAW HER Witnesses in Amy Hillyard’s neighborhood say they may have spotted her walking alone late at night. Investigators are now trying to confirm whether that sighting happened minutes before her car was discovered nearby
More than three weeks after Amy Hillyard vanished on March 25, 2026, the search for the 52-year-old co-owner of Farley’s Coffee continues across Oakland’s neighborhoods, parks, and hiking trails. No evidence of foul play has been reported, but Amy remains…
THE LAST TEXT MESSAGE Friends searching for answers say Amy Hillyard exchanged messages with someone shortly before she vanished on March 25. What investigators are now trying to determine is whether that final conversation reveals where she intended to go that night
Amy Hillyard, the 52-year-old co-owner of the beloved Farley’s Coffee shops in Oakland and San Francisco, has been missing since March 25, 2026. More than three weeks later, her family, friends, and investigators continue an intensive search across Oakland’s trails,…
THE ARGUMENT BEFORE SHE VANISHED? Friends say café owner Amy Hillyard had been under intense emotional strain in the weeks before she disappeared in Oakland. Investigators are now quietly examining whether tension inside the home — including a reported disagreement with her husband — may have played a role in the hours before she vanished on March 25. But one unanswered question remains: what happened after she left the house that night?
Amy Hillyard, a 52-year-old co-owner of the popular Farley’s Coffee shops in Oakland and San Francisco, vanished on March 25, 2026, leaving behind a close-knit family, a thriving business community, and a Bay Area neighborhood stunned by her absence. Described…
THE PRIMROSE HILL TRAGEDY. 21-year-old filmmaker Finbar Sullivan lost his life during a violent altercation on the famous London viewpoint as authorities named 27-year-old Oliuwadamilola Ogunyankinnu in court documents — a small group frozen on the hilltop watching in silence
On the evening of April 7, 2026, the panoramic viewpoint atop Primrose Hill — a beloved north London landmark offering sweeping views of the city skyline — transformed from a place of beauty and relaxation into a scene of sudden…
18-second video at Primrose Hill is now at the center of the investigation after 21-year-old filmmaker Finbar Sullivan collapsed following a heated confrontation; police charged Oliuwadamilola Ogunyankinnu but the missing footage filmed by a girl in a pink vest is still circulating online
On the evening of April 7, 2026, Primrose Hill — one of north London’s most picturesque spots with its sweeping views of the city skyline — became the site of a sudden and deadly confrontation. 21-year-old Finbar Sullivan, a filmmaking…
A 20-second clip allegedly capturing Finbar Sullivan’s final argument atop Primrose Hill is becoming crucial evidence as Oliuwadamilola Ogunyankinnu faces charges—but the three-word assertion is still causing a stir on social media
In the fading light of a spring evening on April 7, 2026, a brief, heated exchange at Primrose Hill’s scenic viewpoint escalated into fatal violence. 21-year-old filmmaking student Finbar Sullivan was testing a new birthday camera when, according to witnesses…
End of content
No more pages to load