King George’s Bridgerton appearances in seasons 1 and 2 are brief, and he is mentioned infrequently – partly because he’s not meant to be a major character and partly because, by that point in time, he was simply too ill to appear publicly. Queen Charlotte, meanwhile, establishes George as a key character, of course. Played in Bridgerton by James Fleet, King George III is portrayed in the spin-off by Corey Mylchreest, in his early 20s. King George III’s three appearances in Bridgerton are initially only relevant because of what they reveal about Queen Charlotte.

The brief dinner scene with Queen Charlotte and King George III in Bridgerton Season 1 provides a somewhat true-to-life explanation for Queen Charlotte’s interest in the fictional Lady Whistledown. As soon as we see how tortured King George III has become, and how much this disturbs his wife, it becomes perfectly clear that Charlotte needs a distraction – and Lady Whistledown provides such a perfectly enveloping and delightful diversion that, at times, Queen Charlotte seems to forget her husband’s poor health. Queen Charlotte goes even further into exploring their romance and their ongoing relationship dynamic, as well as his illness.

The True Story Of King George III’s Illness

His Illness Is A Matter Of Historical Debate

Often reductively referred to as the “Madness of King George”, George III’s psychological issues have been a matter of fierce debate over the years. What is not up for debate is the fact that George was unable to continue ruling as a monarch by the time he reached middle age.

That prompted his son, George IV, the Prince of Wales to take over the king’s duties, as Prince Regent. Sadly, George III’s incoherency and instability made him a poor face for the royal family, and he was kept out of the public eye to protect the monarchy’s image, much like what is seen of King George in Bridgerton.

By King George III’s later years, he was kept confined and out of sight. Unlike what’s seen in Bridgerton, Queen Charlotte had reportedly stopped dining with George. She slept in a separate bedroom from George and refused to be alone with him from 1804 onward. By 1813, when Bridgerton takes place, it’s believed that Queen Charlotte had stopped seeing George altogether. He suffered several extreme periods of ill-health, for a long time attributed to porphyria, and was incarcerated in Kew for his own good. After his final relapse in 1810, the King never recovered, and he died in 1820.

That prompted his son, George IV, the Prince of Wales to take over the king’s duties, as Prince Regent. Sadly, George III’s incoherency and instability made him a poor face for the royal family, and he was kept out of the public eye to protect the monarchy’s image, much like what is seen of King George in Bridgerton.

By King George III’s later years, he was kept confined and out of sight. Unlike what’s seen in Bridgerton, Queen Charlotte had reportedly stopped dining with George. She slept in a separate bedroom from George and refused to be alone with him from 1804 onward. By 1813, when Bridgerton takes place, it’s believed that Queen Charlotte had stopped seeing George altogether. He suffered several extreme periods of ill-health, for a long time attributed to porphyria, and was incarcerated in Kew for his own good. After his final relapse in 1810, the King never recovered, and he died in 1820

King George III’s Illness In Bridgerton

His Illness Keeps Him Largely Hidden Away

The exact cause of King George III’s “madness” is a topic of debate among historians and physicians.

While King George III is mentioned in Bridgerton, he plays a mostly offscreen role, but his illness is very much based on historical accounts of the monarch. According to these accounts, King George III’s illness included symptoms like convulsions, frothing at the mouth, rambling incoherently, bouts of depression and, later in his life, the loss of his hearing, vision, memory, and ability to walk.

After the death of Princess Amelia, George sank into a deep depression and never recovered from the loss of his favorite daughter. In 1811, King George III enacted the Regency Act, which allowed his son George IV to function as regent and become the heir. Queen Charlotte became George’s legal guardian and the king’s mental and physical health continued to deteriorate until his death in 1820.

The exact cause of King George III’s “madness” is a topic of debate among historians and physicians. Until recently, the prevailing theory was that King George III had porphyria (a rare liver disorder) and that his exposure to arsenic contributed to worsening symptoms. Though evidence for King George III having porphyria is well-documented, and the theory is still widely accepted, conflicting theories have emerged in recent years. 

In the last decade or so, scientists, doctors, and historians have posited that King George III did not, in fact, have porphyria, but instead had some combination of bipolar disorder, chronic mania, and dementia. Dr. Peter Garrard of St George’s, University of London [via BBC]. went so far as to call the theory dead, saying:

The porphyria theory is completely dead in the water. This was a psychiatric illness.

What Queen Charlotte Gets Right About How King George Was Treated

Much Of The Treatment Is Accurate For The Time

 As Queen Charlotte: A Bridgerton Story demonstrates, King George III was put through medically-approved hell for the sake of “improving his condition.” Queen Charlotte reveals these treatments in horrifying detail. Rather than opting into the treatment as he does in the show, George was moved to Kew by force, by a team of court physicians and then, finally, by leading mental health expert Dr Francis Willis, whose methods were cruel and beliefs misguided. Willis believed mental illness was a product of overexcitement, and the natural remedy was restrictive, calming measures. These included:

Confinement in a straitjacket
Skin treatment with arsenic powder (a poison that caused blisters) to “draw unwanted humors out”
Extreme fasting and purging
Ice-cold baths to shock the illness from his body
King George was denied cutlery other than a spoon at mealtimes, and forced to eat only soft food like a child
Total isolation from family
No remit to leave the house alone, where he was confined to the first floor only

Unlike in Queen Charlotte, when George was being treated with these torturous methods, which continued throughout his life, Charlotte and his daughter would be at Kew as well. The extent of the treatments are shown in Queen Charlotte, though some of it is left to the imagination, making them arguably even worse.

Queen Charlotte Settles The Debate On King George’s Illness

The Series Gives The King Symptoms That Align With Psychological Disorders

…modern theories suggest King George III was suffering from bipolar disorder and possibly schizophrenia…

While the prevailing theory for a long time was that King George III was suffering from porphyria – which may well have been the case given the use of arsenic in the “cutting edge” treatments he was subjected to – modern theories suggest King George III was suffering from bipolar disorder and possibly schizophrenia, which Queen Charlotte follows the thinking of.

George’s condition is clearly something he’s had since he was a child, much to his mother’s dismay, and has been hidden for the sake of the sanctity of The Crown. As King, George cannot show any weakness, and his legitimate medical problems are deemed something that must be cured or hidden at all costs. That’s also why George hides it from Charlotte and why King George is no longer seen by the public in Bridgerton.

Queen Charlotte clearly falls on the side of modern theories on King George’s “madness”, following the far more sympathetic line that he struggled with debilitating psychological issues – hallucinations, absences, and bouts of mania included. While his doctor does suggest that talking through George’s problems is the right approach, that more modern therapy style quickly gives way to physical abuse that simply compounds the King’s condition.

Could the Bridgerton universe be further expanded by a second season of the Queen Charlotte spin-off? Here’s everything we know so far.

King George’s Treatment Isn’t The Only Change Queen Charlotte Made

The Birdgerton UNiverse Acts As A Parallel History

King George’s Bridgerton treatment is not the only change made in the series. Bridgerton’s universe is ultimately historical fiction, using real historical figures to tell a fictional story, and the Queen Charlotte series maintains that. The most obvious example in the series is the “Great Experiment” when Queen Charlotte becomes queen. While there is historical evidence to suggest that Queen Charlotte’s Portuguese lineage also includes African ancestry, and she is sometimes referenced as the first Black Queen of England, there was no real shift in England when she became a monarch to include people of color in higher social standing.

Likewise, the timeline in Bridgerton doesn’t entirely line up with the real-life history of England. While Charlotte is said to have primarily been raised by her older brother after the death of her parents in the show, that isn’t entirely true. In 1761 when Charlotte is adjusting to life in England with George, Queen Charlotte’s mother would have still been alive in the real world. Her father did die when she was eight though, so the series took liberties with her family origin in order to tell the story of her brother escorting her to an arranged marriage.

The point is also made in Queen Charlotte: A Bridgerton Story that King George’s mother and her advisors are the ones who chose Charlotte to be George’s wife. According to the Los Angeles Times, that’s not entirely true either. Charlotte was someone of a noble bloodline who was added to a list of options for George at the last minute for his arranged relationship.

Some of the stipulations included a woman who was a Protestant because of the religious links to the crown at the time, as well as a woman who was educated but not an intellectual, so she wouldn’t interfere with the King’s decisions. Bridgerton’s Queen Charlotte series does depict a similar discussion, but George isn’t given a choice.

Of course, Queen Charlotte: A Bridgerton Story fans do understand that not everything in the series is going to be historically accurate when going into the new stories. What provides the audience with a good story is going to trump historical accuracy for the Bridgerton universe.

How King George In Queen Charlotte Compares To The Books

King George And Queent Charlotte Do Not Appear In The Novels

Though the Bridgerton series on Netflix are inspired by the novels by Julia Quinn, not everything in the shows are present in the books. Initially, King George and Queen Charlotte are not characters in the books. The monarchy is mentioned in that it’s made clear what time period the characters live in (the early 1800s), but they do not have as large of a presence as they do in the Netflix series.

In the series, for example, Queen Charlotte plays a match-making role with nearly all of the main couples while her husband is hidden away. None of that happens in the novels. Likewise, her arranged marriage with King George, which is the premise of Queen Charlotte: A Bridgerton Series, does not occur in the novels. Her friendship with Lady Danbury is not present either. In the series, Queen Charlotte actually takes on some of the roles that Lady Danbury has in the novels, like issuing a reward for the naming of Lady Whistledown.

Of course, following Shonda Rhimes creating the Queen Charlotte spinoff for Netflix, a novelization of the series has been published. That novel is penned by Rhimes and Quinn and follows the events of the show, so the King George that appears in that novel is, essentially, the same as the show.