
There are a lot of fascinating — and dark — theories out there about the “Harry Potter” franchise, but this one is particularly disturbing.
In the fourth book and film, “Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire,” the legendary and terrifying Dark Lord Voldemort (played in this movie by Ralph Fiennes) finally regains his human form, thanks in large part to his loyal henchman Peter “Wormtail” Pettigrew (Timothy Spall). After tricking Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe) into taking a targeted magical teleportation device known as a Portkey to the Little Hangleton graveyard, Pettigrew is seen carrying a strange infant-sized figure, which turns out to be Voldemort himself in a pathetic, tiny form. So why is he like this before he gets his human body back?
One Redditor, u/JMueller2012, presented a theory. “This is pretty dark but the tentative body that Voldemort had in Goblet of Fire (the infant-like one) was him possessing a dead child from the graveyard,” they wrote. “There’s a really dark theory that Bertha Jorkins was pregnant and that he possessed the fetus to use as a body after he murdered her and Womrtail extracted it.” (As a reminder, Bertha Jorkins, who isn’t seen in the films, is a Ministry of Magic employee that Voldemort used for information and then killed.)
So is the body Voldemort himself, or a deceased infant that he stole from a grave? We may never have the answer, but there’s absolutely no argument that Voldemort went to great and horrifying lengths to return to full power.
Voldemort goes through an incredibly dark process to return to power

Let’s backtrack for one moment and ask one question: how exactly does some sort of infant creature turn into one of the most dangerous wizards who’s ever lived? When Harry arrives at the graveyard after ostensibly winning the Triwizard Tournament — he and his fellow Hogwarts champion Cedric Diggory (Robert Pattinson) agree to tie, grabbing the Triwizard Cup together before they’re suddenly and unexpectedly transported to Little Hangleton — Peter Pettigrew cruelly and casually kills Cedric before immobilizing Harry against a grave marker. From there, he places the “baby Voldemort” (or whatever it is) into a cauldron and adds a bone purloined from the grave of Voldemort’s father Tom Riddle, Pettigrew’s own flesh (he severs his own arm, hand and all, for his master), and Harry’s blood. In the chapter, Harry watches, horrified, as Pettigrew recites the following incantation in parts: “Bone of the father, unknowingly given, you will renew your son! Flesh of the servant, willingly sacrificed, you will revive your master. Blood of the enemy, forcibly taken, you will resurrect your foe.”
Series author Joanne K. Rowling hasn’t spoken extensively on this topic — and certainly hasn’t confirmed whether or not the infant in question is Voldemort, a stolen child, or a child who belonged to Bertha Jorkins — but she did, at one point, discuss it with Pottercast while talking about some of the most disgusting things found in her franchise. After saying that there are two things two awful to discuss, the other being the creation of Horcruxes, Rowling revealed, “One of them is how Pettigrew brought Voldemort back into a rudimentary body […] ‘Cause I told my editor what I thought happened there and she looked as though she was gonna vomit.”
Voldemort is seen in his disturbing infant form one more time before the series ends

Towards the end of “Harry Potter,” Harry, naturally, defeats Voldemort, finally destroying all of the Dark Lord’s Horcruxes and vanquishing him in battle … but before that, he has to sacrifice himself at Voldemort’s hands to kill the Horcrux that lives inside Harry. When Harry does this, he’s transported to a sort of afterworld that looks quite a lot like London’s King’s Cross Station, and there, he encounters Albus Dumbledore (Michael Gambon), his deceased mentor. While the two talk about Harry’s choices — specifically, whether he should “move on” or return to the world of the living and kill Voldemort for good — a bloodied, horrible-looking baby shares the space with them. Apparently, Joanne K. Rowling has spoken about this to — specifically, to Edmund Kern and Hogwarts Professor, who asked what exactly the baby is.
“I’ve been asked this a LOT,” Rowling said. “It is the last piece of soul Voldemort possesses. When Voldemort attacks Harry, they both fall temporarily unconscious, and both their souls – Harry’s undamaged and healthy, Voldemort’s stunted and maimed – appear in the limbo where Harry meets Dumbledore.” It’s pretty interesting that, without Horcruxes, Voldemort takes the form of a scary infant once again, and it does seem to invalidate the dark fan theory about stolen dead children … but that theory is still disturbingly fascinating.
The “Harry Potter” movies are available to stream on Max now.
News
HE IS NOT HER BOYFRIEND 🚨 Police are investigating allegations that a jealous argument involving a boy may have sparked a confrontation that left 16-year-old Chloe Watson Dransfield seriously injured and subsequently fatally wounded after a party in Leeds. Three suspects have appeared in court on murder charges. But a witness says those exact words were shouted moments before the situation escalated… 👇
Teenagers accused of murdering Chloe Watson Dransfield pictured for the first time Chloe sustained stab wounds and was found in a Leeds street on Saturday morning View 2 Images Archie Rycroft and Kayla Smith The teenagers accused of murdering Chloe…
Jealousy after a party? 🚨 Detectives are investigating whether jealousy was the cause of the confrontation that left 16-year-old Chloe Watson Dransfield seriously injured and fatally wounded in the streets of Leeds. Three suspects have appeared in court charged with murder. But neighbors say the argument suddenly escalated when someone mentioned a boy’s name… 👇
Jealousy after a party? 🚨 Detectives are investigating whether jealousy was the cause of the confrontation that left 16-year-old Chloe Watson Dransfield seriously injured and fatally wounded in the streets of Leeds. Three suspects have appeared in court charged with…
A BOY AT THE CENTER OF THE INCIDENT? 🚨 Police are investigating whether an argument over a boy led to the fatal stabbing of 16-year-old Chloe Watson Dransfield after a party in Leeds. Three teenagers have now appeared in court charged with murder. But witnesses claim two girls argued over the same boy that evening… 👇
Police investigating the fatal stabbing of 16-year-old Chloe Watson Dransfield in Leeds are examining whether a heated argument over a boy — possibly involving two girls clashing over the same person — sparked the confrontation that ended her life after…
THE SUSPECTS ARE PICTURED FOR THE FIRST TIME
THE SUSPECTS ARE PICTURED FOR THE FIRST TIME 🚨Two teenagers accused over the fatal st@bbing of Chloe Watson Dransfield, 16, in Leeds have now been pictured as they appeared in court.Police say the attack happened after a party at around…
A LOVE TRIANGLE… OR SOMETHING MORE? 🚨 Investigators are examining whether a dispute involving a boy triggered the attack on Chloe Watson Dransfield, 16, in Leeds. Five young suspects have been detained as police reconstruct the early-morning confrontation. But one neighbour says the argument outside the house had been building for nearly 10 minutes before anyone saw Chloe collapse👇
Investigators probing the fatal stabbing of 16-year-old Chloe Watson Dransfield in Leeds are examining whether a dispute involving a boy — possibly a romantic rivalry or love triangle — triggered the early-morning confrontation that ended her life. With five young…
A DISPUTE OVER A BOY… OR SOMETHING MORE? 🚨 Police investigating the killing of Chloe Watson Dransfield in Leeds say the attack may have followed a confrontation involving several teenagers. Five suspects have been detained. But detectives are now questioning whether another earlier incident that night played a role👇
A Dispute Over a Boy… Or Something More? 🚨 The tragic death of 16-year-old Chloe Watson Dransfield in Leeds continues to raise difficult questions as police piece together the events of that fatal early morning. What many initially described as…
End of content
No more pages to load